Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Tower Wilayah Surabaya

Prasetyo, Andi (2020) Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Pembangunan Tower Wilayah Surabaya. Masters thesis, Untag 1945 Surabaya.

	Text Cover.pdf Download (168kB)
	Text Abstrak.pdf Download (118kB)
	Text Daftar Isi.pdf Download (125kB)
	Text Lembar Pernyataan Persetujuan Publikasi Karya Ilmiah MT-31-andi p.pdf Download (693kB)
	Text Lampiran.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text SURAT PENYATAAN TIDAK PLAGIAT - ANDI PRASETYO.pdf Download (694kB)
	Text Bab I.pdf Download (161kB)
	Text Bab II.pdf Download (335kB)
	Text Bab III.pdf Download (170kB)
	Text Bab IV.pdf Download (511kB)
	Text Bab V.pdf Download (152kB)

Abstract

The rapid development of telecommunications requires the addition of a BTS transmitter network. Due to land limitations and the complexity of licensing, alternative telecommunication tower types are needed. Tower pole as an alternative telecommunications investment. To determine the feasibility of Tower Pole, it must be compared with Tower Greenfields. The method used by the analysis of Life Cyle Cost or life cycle costs which is the overall cost over the life of the plan that is for 25 years. Costs are calculated as initial costs, operational costs, routine spare part costs and dismantling costs at the end of the planned life The purpose of this study is to calculate Life Cycle Cost on two types of towers so that the level of feasibility is known, it is necessary to know the radius of the tower greenfields of the magnitude of 9 (Nine) X tower pole Life cycle costs (LCC) for tower greenfields starting from 2019 to economic life for 25 years include initial costs of Rp1,574,594,170, maintenance of Rp3,131,117,258, replacement batteries of Rp172,816,381 and dismantling of Rp23,268,008 .The life cycle cost (LCC) of tower pole starting from 2019 until the economic age of 25 years is obtained including an initial cost of Rp 639,708,300, maintenance of Rp 457,883,814, Battery replacement of Rp 86,408,190 and dismantling Rp 2,115,573The results of the analysis of the feasibility of tower greenfields investment on cycle costs incurred for 25 years, NPV = 13,502,642,390> 0, PP occurred in the 4th year in May and IRR 23.5%> MARR 17.5%The results of the analysis of the feasibility of Pole tower investment against the cost of the cycle that occurred Income for 25 years, NPV =4,229,144,725> 0, PP occurred in the 4th year and IRR 25.96%> MARR 17.5%Of the two types of towers equally worthy of investment, the research results of Tower pole from the Greenfields Tower are more profitable based on BCR calculations where the Pole tower has a BCR = 15.36 and the Greenfields tower BCR = 12.33

Actions (login required)

View Item