An Analysis of Responses on Directives in John Tiffany and Jack Thorne's Harry Potter and The Curse Child

Hardika, Septya (2018) An Analysis of Responses on Directives in John Tiffany and Jack Thorne's Harry Potter and The Curse Child. Undergraduate thesis, Untag 1945 Surabaya.

	Text Abstrak.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text Bab I.pdf Download (145kB)
	Text Bab III.pdf Download (137kB)
	Text Bab IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (367kB)
	Text Bab V.pdf Download (129kB)
	Text Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (117kB)
	Text Jurnal Penelitian.pdf Download (176kB)
	Text Jurnal Turnitin.pdf Download (3MB)
	Text Lampiran I.pdf Download (283kB)
	Text Lampiran II.pdf Download (213kB)
	Text Lampiran III.pdf Download (193kB)
	Text Lampiran IV.pdf Download (100kB)

Abstract

The study analyzes speech act, especially directives illocutionary acts that are found in Harry Potter and the Curse Child drama which is written by John Tiffany and Jack Thorne. The objectives of the study are to analyse the kinds of directives illocutionary acts, the types of sentences in directives illocutionary acts, and their responses. This study uses qualitative research approach to conduct this research. From the data source, the writer finds sixty six (66) data of directives utterances. Then, the data are arranged systematically in accordance to the problem of the study. The data are categorized into four (4) kinds of directives illocutionary acts using Yule’s theory, there are nineteen (19) orders, twenty eight (28) requests, twelve (12) suggestions, and seven (7) commands. The study found that there are thirty-five (35) imperatives, twenty�six (26) declaratives, and five (5) interrogatives using Brown,Nilson,Shaw and Weldon’s theory. Meanwhile on responses, there are thirty (30) compliance and thirtysix (36) refusal. The writer finds that in directives, the sentences are not only in imperative forms but also in other forms, that is declarative and interrogative. The writer also finds that the responses of directives can be as a compliance and refusal. In compliance response, the hearers comply the directive because they agree or are forced by the speakers ; meanwhile in refusal response, the hearers refuse the directive not only with “No” as an answer but they give an argument to refuse it.

Actions (login required)

View Item